Deployment Decision Guide
Use this decision tree to determine the best GCP deployment option for your project.
Quick Decision Tree
START
│
├─ Is it a static site (HTML/CSS/JS only)?
│ ├─ YES → Firebase Hosting or Cloud Storage + CDN
│ └─ NO ↓
│
├─ Do you need server-side rendering (SSR)?
│ ├─ YES → Cloud Run (or GCE for complex cases)
│ └─ NO ↓
│
├─ Do you need persistent connections (WebSockets)?
│ ├─ YES → Compute Engine (GCE)
│ └─ NO ↓
│
├─ Is traffic highly variable or unpredictable?
│ ├─ YES → Cloud Run (scale to zero)
│ └─ NO ↓
│
├─ Do you need long-running processes (>60 min)?
│ ├─ YES → Compute Engine (GCE)
│ └─ NO ↓
│
├─ Is cost the primary concern?
│ ├─ YES → Cloud Run with min_instances: 0
│ └─ NO ↓
│
└─ Default → Cloud Run (best balance)Detailed Comparison
Cloud Run (Recommended Default)
Best For:
- REST APIs
- Web applications
- Microservices
- Variable traffic patterns
- Cost-sensitive projects
Pros:
- Scale to zero (no idle costs)
- Automatic scaling
- Managed SSL certificates
- Simple deployment
- Pay only for what you use
- Container-based (portable)
Cons:
- Cold starts (1-5 seconds)
- 60-minute request timeout max
- No persistent local storage
- No WebSocket support (use Pub/Sub)
- VPC connector needed for Cloud SQL
Use When:
- You want the simplest deployment
- Traffic is variable or unpredictable
- You can accept cold starts
- Your requests complete in <60 minutes
Compute Engine (VMs)
Best For:
- WebSocket applications
- Background job servers
- Legacy applications
- Custom software requirements
- Persistent local storage needs
Pros:
- Full control over environment
- Persistent connections supported
- No cold starts
- Unlimited request duration
- Local SSD storage available
- Can run any software
Cons:
- Always-on costs
- Manual scaling required
- Manual SSL setup
- More operational overhead
- You manage updates/security
Use When:
- Need WebSocket connections
- Have long-running processes
- Need custom system packages
- Want predictable performance
- Have consistent, predictable traffic
Firebase Hosting
Best For:
- Static websites
- Single Page Applications (SPAs)
- Flutter Web (static builds)
- React/Vue builds
- Documentation sites
Pros:
- Free tier is generous
- Global CDN included
- Automatic SSL
- Simple deployment
- GitHub integration
Cons:
- Static content only
- Limited backend (use Functions)
- Less control over caching
Use When:
- Deploying static files only
- Want the simplest possible setup
- Don’t need server-side processing
App Engine (Standard)
Best For:
- Traditional web apps
- Python, Java, Node.js, PHP, Go, Ruby
- Auto-scaling web apps
Pros:
- Fully managed
- Auto-scaling
- Multiple language runtimes
- Traffic splitting built-in
Cons:
- Less portable than containers
- More expensive than Cloud Run
- Slower deployments
- Vendor lock-in
Use When:
- Need traffic splitting for A/B tests
- Prefer platform-managed runtimes
- Have existing App Engine apps
Cloud Functions
Best For:
- Event-driven processing
- Webhooks
- Background jobs
- API endpoints (simple)
Pros:
- Simplest deployment
- Pay per invocation
- Event triggers built-in
- No container management
Cons:
- Limited runtimes
- 9-minute timeout (Gen 1)
- Cold starts
- Less control
Use When:
- Building event-driven systems
- Need simple webhooks
- Want minimal infrastructure
Decision Matrix by Project Type
Flutter Web
| Requirement | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Static hosting | Firebase Hosting |
| With backend API | Firebase + Cloud Run API |
| Full control | Cloud Run |
React / Vue
| Requirement | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Static SPA | Firebase Hosting |
| With SSR (Next.js/Nuxt) | Cloud Run |
| Complex backend | Cloud Run + Cloud SQL |
Next.js
| Requirement | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| SSR required | Cloud Run |
| ISR/static | Firebase Hosting + Cloud Functions |
| Enterprise | Cloud Run + Cloud SQL |
Laravel / PHP
| Requirement | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Simple app | Cloud Run + Cloud SQL |
| Queue workers | GCE + Cloud SQL |
| High traffic | Cloud Run + GCE workers |
Node.js
| Requirement | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| REST API | Cloud Run |
| WebSocket server | Compute Engine |
| Microservices | Cloud Run |
| Background jobs | Cloud Functions + Pub/Sub |
Python / FastAPI
| Requirement | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| REST API | Cloud Run |
| ML inference | Cloud Run (GPU) or Vertex AI |
| Data processing | Cloud Functions + BigQuery |
Cost vs Performance Trade-offs
COST
↑
│
GCE │ GCE
(always-on) │ (high spec)
│
─────────────────────────────────→ PERFORMANCE
│
Cloud Run │ Cloud Run
(scale-to-0) │ (min instances)
│
Firebase │
Hosting │Choosing Based on Budget
| Monthly Budget | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| $0 (free) | Firebase Hosting / Cloud Run (free tier) |
| $0-20 | Cloud Run with scale-to-zero |
| $20-50 | Cloud Run with 1-2 min instances |
| $50-100 | Cloud Run or small GCE |
| $100+ | GCE or dedicated Cloud Run |
Questions to Ask
Before recommending a deployment option, ask:
- Traffic Pattern: Is traffic steady, variable, or spiky?
- Latency Tolerance: Can you accept 1-5 second cold starts?
- Request Duration: How long do requests typically take?
- Connection Type: HTTP only, or need WebSockets?
- Database: Need SQL, NoSQL, or none?
- Background Jobs: Any async processing needed?
- Budget: What’s the monthly budget?
- Compliance: Any data residency requirements?
Sample Recommendation Format
## Deployment Recommendation for [Project Name]
**Project Type**: [Flutter Web / React / Next.js / etc.]
**Detected Requirements**:
- [ ] Server-side rendering: Yes/No
- [ ] Database needed: Yes/No
- [ ] WebSockets: Yes/No
- [ ] Background jobs: Yes/No
### Recommended: Cloud Run
**Why Cloud Run?**
- Best cost-to-performance ratio for your use case
- Handles variable traffic efficiently
- Simple deployment with Docker
- Free tier covers low traffic
**Estimated Monthly Cost**: $0-15
**Alternative Considered**: Compute Engine
- Would cost $20/month fixed
- Better for consistent high traffic
- Not recommended due to variable traffic pattern
**Next Steps**:
1. Confirm deployment target
2. Review cost estimate
3. Proceed with setupLast updated on